DIA Wants To Remove Art But Not Everyone Is Ready For Takeoff
Featured on denver.cbslocal.com
Denver International Airport is moving forward with plans to remove a large and now controversial piece of art in the middle of the Concourse C but not everyone is onboard.
“This piece has been particularly problematic and it’s reached a point where it’s both dangerous for people traveling and very cost prohibitive for a maintenance schedule,” said Heath Montgomery, a spokesman for the airport.
The piece in question is called “Interior Garden” by Michael Singer and stretches between the two train platforms. The piece is described by passersby as “urban renewal theme” as vegetation grows around concrete structures.
Singer says he didn’t know the airport was trying to get rid of his piece until last month when he received a formal letter from the airport’s Chief Executive Officer Kim Day.
The airport has now officially asked the city to deaccession the piece, but the Commission on Cultural Affairs voted against it.
“No, I do not support the deaccession and I was very pleased to hear that the Commission on Cultural Affairs voted 15 to 3 against the deaccession as well. The Garden is a very special piece for many travelers and it’s reassuring to know that the commission values this piece as much as I do,” Singer said in an email to CBS4.
The commission has suggested the artist and the airport find a common ground to keep the piece thriving but tensions may not allow that. The cost of the project doubled as it was installed in the early 1990s and costs between the airport and the artist have never aligned since.
The final decision on deaccession will be made by Kent Rice, the Executive Director of Denver Arts and Venues, and he’s accepting public comment through May 16.
Airport Is Fed Up With Costs
Airport officials say the time for the piece has run out because it’s become too expensive to maintain.
“The airport over the last 22 years has had a lot of problems with this ranging from leaks and pests to safety hazard,” said Montgomery. “It literally is a garden, so there’s a layer of top soil there’s an irrigation system, there were sprinklers at one point and we’ve seen failures at all those points along the way.”
The airport calculates maintenance over the past two decades has totaled more than $800,000 including being replanted six times and constant care. The infrastructure for the piece is non-existent and now requires hand watering which is costing nearly $15,000 per year.
“Over the years we’ve brought in architects, construction experts, irrigation experts and we also brought in experts from the Denver Botanic Gardens. Some of the best minds of this topic. And what they’ve told us is we’ve done an extremely good job up keeping what we have given extremely challenging conditions, but the artist prescribes that we use certain types of tropical plants. They don’t thrive in Colorado’s environment and they certainly don’t thrive in an airport environment under a covered roof. So we’ve brought in a lot of experts over the years who say the same thing we think, it’s just not doable anymore.”
Artist Wants To See His Work Stay
The Public Art Policy Committee did not support the request for deaccession and recommended the artist and the airport work together. Those recommendations were reviewed by the Commission on Cultural Affairs and many of its members agreed saying new technology could help the piece thrive.
“In my letters to the airport and the Commission on Cultural Affairs I suggested several ways the garden can be restored and enhanced. My suggestions cost far less than the airport’s estimate to remove the Garden. I am confident we can all work together on some creative solutions to the airport’s concerns and I look forward to collaborating with the airport staff,” singer said.
Click here to read the full article.